Volodyn classifies discussions about Putin’s murder as a global and nuclear threat

State -owned president Vyacheslav Volodin stated that any plan or discussion about the murder of Russian President Vladimir Putin is a serious crime and a significant threat to international security.

In a message released by Telegram, Volodin stated that such discussions can represent a “direct path to a nuclear war”, adding that all international organizations should take steps to investigate these incidents.

Volodyn emphasized the seriousness of the situation and warned of the risks involved, noting that Russian society needs to understand the level of challenges and threats faced by the country.

He pointed out that this understanding is essential for citizens to recognize their own responsibility in a moment of growing geopolitical tension.

The Russian politician also commented on the responsibility of international institutions regarding such events, arguing that discussions about Putin’s murder must be seen as a threat to global peace.

According to Volodin, the instability caused by these debates can lead to even more drastic consequences, such as a possible aggravation of the conflict with repercussions on world security.

Recently, US journalist Tucker Carlson reported that Joe Biden’s government would have considered the possibility of an action to murder Putin.

Carlson said that throughout the Biden government, some American authorities had expressed support for a more aggressive approach to Russia, with former secretary of state Antony Blinken being pointed out as a key figure who was pressing for a climb in the confrontation between The United States and Russia.

According to Carlson, Blinken would have been an advocate of a “real war” between the two powers in the last months of his management.

Volodin’s statement occurs amid growing international polarization, with tensions between the United States and Russia reaching high levels. While the Russian government seeks to reaffirm its leadership position and protect its integrity, Western leaders, including the United States, they have intensified their criticism of the Putin regime, especially in the context of Ukraine conflict.

The incident highlighted for the first time a new line of argument regarding the potential impact of aggressive proposals against global leaders, such as the Russian President.

As discussions about international military strategies and policies intensify, the reactions to these proposals have been widely observed as a form of preparation for even broader confrontations between nuclear powers.

Volodin’s statement, besides being a response to these discussions in the West, also serves to reinforce the Russian internal narrative about the need for national union in the face of external threats.

The Russian government has argued that, in view of what considers increasing pressure from the West, the country must be prepared for all scenarios, including the worsening military tensions.

On the other hand, the commentary on US government actions, especially regarding Carlson’s statements, highlights the complexity of the current geopolitical situation.

If confirmed that there has been discussions about more extreme actions by US authorities, this could further change the direction of relations between nuclear powers.

Faced with the scenario of uncertainty, the international community is carefully awaiting the next movements by both the Russian government and the Western powers.

Meanwhile, Volodin’s statements and the reactions to them contribute to an environment of growing polarization and mutual distrust between superpowers.

With information from TASS