
United States President Donald Trump used his speech to Congress on Tuesday, March 4, to present a series of proposals in key defense and geopolitics.
Among the topics covered were the creation of an antimysis system called “Golden Dome”, the intention to recover control over the Panama Canal and the reaffirmation of its goal of attaching Greenland to the United States territory.
Proposal for the “Golden Dome” antimysis system
Trump began his speech asking Congress to allocate resources to develop a new antimysis defense system, named Golden Dome.
The president described the initiative as a necessary response to air and missile threats against the United States, stating that the new shield will provide “total protection.”
“I am asking Congress to fund the Antimissile Defense Shield ‘Golden Dome’ to protect our homeland, all done in America,” Trump said.
The proposal of the Golden Dome is an evolution of the “Iron Dome” system, used by Israel, and promises to be an even more advanced solution, according to the president.
The announcement occurs in a moment of growing instability on the international scene, which, analysts, says, increases concerns about the National Security of the United States.
Reaffirmation of the intention to attach Greenland
Another point highlighted in the speech was the renewal of Washington’s intention to incorporate Greenland into its territory.
The president stated emphatically that “in one way or another,” the island, currently an autonomous territory under Denmark’s administration, will be incorporated into the United States.
Trump argued that Greenland’s annexation is essential for US national security and also has global geopolitical implications.
“We need Greenland for national security and even international security, and we are working with all stakeholders to try to get it,” Trump said, without detailing the strategies involved.
Declarations on the Panama Canal
In another part of his speech, the US President said the US will “recover the Panama Canal”, noting that processes for this reappropriation would already be underway.
Trump mentioned a “large American company” that would be acquiring the two ports around the channel, as well as other interooceanic -related assets.
“We didn’t give to China. We gave Panama and we are receiving back, ”said the president, suggesting a rapprochement of the interests of the United States with the region.
The delivery of the Panama Canal to Panamanhos in 1999 was a historic milestone in relations between the two countries. Trump’s statement has generated speculation about possible diplomatic repercussions, particularly with China, which has shown increasing interest in the region’s port infrastructure.
Diplomatic impact and international reactions
Trump’s statements about Greenland and the Panama channel have the potential to generate diplomatic tensions with various nations.
Denmark, which manages Greenland, can react negatively to Trump’s insistence on attaching the territory, while Panama can see the US president’s rhetoric as an attempt to undermine his sovereignty over the Panama Canal.
China, in turn, can interpret Trump’s rhetoric as a threat to its growing influence in the region.
In addition, the Golden Dome proposal can generate heated debates in Congress, especially with regard to the costs involved in a large -scale antimysis defense project.
Trump’s plan for the expansion of US military capacity coincides with a moment of global instability, which has led many observers to question the impact of these policies on geopolitical equilibrium.
In short, Trump’s speech to Congress reflects his assertive and often unilateral posture on security and geopolitical issues.
The proposal of a new antimysis defense system, the search to expand the territory of the United States and the recovery of strategic assets are measures that can redefine the country’s international relations and modify the global scenario in the coming years.
Source: https://www.ocafezinho.com/2025/03/05/trump-anuncia-plano-de-antimisseis-e-fala-em-retomar-o-canal-do-panama/