Pilar Rodríguez, provincial prosecutor of Madrid, has declared as accused in the Supreme Court to ratify that she did not leaked data from the fiscal fraud of the couple of Isabel Díaz Ayuso. Neither the Finance file, nor the complaint nor the mail with which his lawyer offered a pact and recognized his crimes. The full file of the case, Rodríguez explained today, was available to more than 500 people once the complaint was filed, and the mail with the confession was accessible for 60 people before arriving at the hands of the Attorney General on the night of the 13th of 13 March. Rodríguez, one of the three people charged in the case, has also loaded against the Civil Guard for the claims of his reports that cement the suspicions of the judge.
Sources of the case explain to Eldiario.es that Judge Ángel Hurtado has specified something that already suggested yesterday during the statement of the Attorney General: that the object of the case has changed. The Supreme Court established in October that the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office on the case of Alberto González Amador was not criminal, but that we had to investigate who had previously leaked the mail of the businessman to the press. “There is no unduly revealed information, given the public knowledge of the facts,” said the Supreme Court on that statement.
Hurtado explained today to the parties that the cause is no longer directed against the filtration of the mail. He also investigates the moment she, two days after the complaint was filed, sent the entire file of the case to the Attorney General, and that the press release of March 14 so far exonerated is under the magnifying glass of the investigation and if Rodriguez participated in his elaboration.
The provincial prosecutor of Madrid has reiterated what he already affirmed before the Superior Court of Justice in his first appearance last June: that she did not know that they had denounced the couple of Isabel Díaz Ayuso up to two days after taking the case to The courts, when he received a call from the Attorney General’s Office asking for the case information. From there, Rodríguez explained, complied with the requests for information and accounts to send the file and did not know anything until the morning of March 12, when Eldiario.es published the first exclusive on the case.
On the night of March 13, when the Prosecutor’s Office launched the machinery to obtain all the information of the Julián Salto case, she intermediate to obtain the emails and deny several false information that circulated. One of them was the one that Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, chief of Ayuso Cabinet in the Community of Madrid spread. The other, which has defined as “erroneous”, was the one published by the world at 21.29 at night: that the Prosecutor’s Office had offered a pact to the businessman, when he had been the other way around. The indication, both of the Attorney General and the Chief Prosecutor of Madrid, Almudena Lastra, was to deny “inverted information.”
571 people with access to the case
The prosecutor explained to Judge Hurtado that a total of 571 people, including officials and prosecutors, had access to the entire tax file of González Amador after his case was prosecuted in the Plaza de Castilla in Madrid. On the mail with the confession whose filtration is investigated, Rodríguez has encrypted in 60 people who had “direct” access before it was published on the night of March 13: the 16 prosecutors and officials with access to the mail to which he was referred but also the superiors of the Provincial Prosecutor and the Superior and various officials.
The defense of the Provincial Prosecutor and the Attorney General, exercised by two State lawyers, tries Ortiz and his collaborators on the night of March 13 of last year. Among other people of the 60s who had access to the email, Rodríguez explained that high positions of the Prosecutor’s Office in Madrid, in addition to herself, also had access to the mailbox to which Carlos Neira, lawyer of the businessman, sent his confession.
Pilar Rodríguez has taken advantage of his statement to deny some deductions that the Central Operating Unit (UCO) of the Civil Guard made in his report after analyzing his WhatsApp messages. For example, it was sliding that she was waiting for a rise at that time, when in reality she had just been renewed in her position and could not opt for any other, and that she wanted to continue there. “I find it humiliating that the UCO performs that inference,” he said.
The attorney general denies the filtration: “Roundly, no”
Rodríguez has arrived at the Supreme Court at 9.35 in the morning a day after the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, appeared yesterday for almost an hour and a half before Judge Hurtado. In his appearance he denied having filtered the press OA La Moncloa Confidential data of the case of Alberto González Amador or having tried After being denounced.
The attorney general refused to answer Judge Hurtado’s questions, as he explained shortly after entering the Chamber, that the instructor’s criteria was already “predetermined.” “Roundly, no,” he replied several times when the State’s lawyer asked him if he had leaked the information in the case of González Amador. He pointed out that the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office should have publicly informed the case when the complaint was filed and, nevertheless, it was not done.
Judge Hurtado already referred to the possibility that the object of the case was widened to the informative note and the filtration of the entire file, and not only to the filtration of the mail as the Criminal Chamber had ordered. Asked about the State Advocacy for the current scope of the investigations, the judge referred to a car on January 13. In which he called to declare the three accused and in which he accused the attorney general of leading a strategy to filter all the data of the case to the press and the Moncloa to harm Isabel Díaz Ayuso.
Source: www.eldiario.es
