“The first thing we have to mention in any discussion talk that we are is the genocide that is happening in Gaza. At the end of the 60s, we could not start without appoint Occupation forces “.
Thus began his intervention Christian Castillo in the debate organized by the neighborhood association and popular library Cornelio Saavdera last Friday. There he debated with Esteban Paulón of Citizen Movement and Santiago Roberto de Force Patria. A cycle called “Meeting with candidates” that highlights the importance of popular libraries in the social field.
“It cannot be that there are political blocks that say they defend popular interests and cannot pronounce the word gaza or not to genocide. But it does not happen, it does not happen. And it is the truth. And there are blocks that have friends in the Parliamentary Friendship Group with Israel and photos are taken with the ambassador,” he continued.
“All solids fades in the air,” he cited the communist manifesto, Castillo. He warned that “the junctures are very changing, the times are very changing and are also very convulsive and in that convulsive world you cannot have warmth. But genocide cannot be warm.”
“The second topic to whom I want to refer to: three letters f, M, I. International Mental Fund. There is no future with the IMF. Let’s internalize it deeply, we break with that blackmail if you break with the background what bad that will go, because until now we do not break with the background and we are going very badly,” he continued.
He referred to this point to the subject retired. The last three governments and grabbed it with retirees and retirees. Why did the three acted in this way? He asked rhetorically: “The IMF is obliged. FMI. The background bureaucrats believe that a lot of retirement is charged here, they believe that no one else has to retire and there we have another a sensitive issue that one both, IMF and retirees.”
“Either we build a mobilization to break the dependency with the background and ignore that illegal, illegitimate and fraudulent debt, or the rest will be grades of the adjustment,” he said.
He added that “only 12% of those who are currently retiring per year will retire. Some and some may have the Puan and others would be without any coverage. What does the ruling class think? That there does not have to be more retirement, except for very few people. So, there we have a nodal point and that leads us, obvious, to the fight with the International Monal background.”
Another of the issues addressed by Castillo is the repressive legislation that Patricia Bullrich voted. At this point he went to the referent of Union for the country: “I would like to explain why in deputies they voted against and in the Senate voted in favor of recidivism and reiteration.”
However, he did not forget the rest of the governance givingmiths and emphasized that Milei was able to advance with his economic laws and repressive laws because he had complicities.
“Sometimes the radicals put the wig and sometimes a Peronist from Catamarca, or Tucumán. Then, when also thinking what representation we are going to have in Congress, we must see this year and peak’s balance.”
He also argued with the referral of the Socialist Party. Said Castillo said: “You cannot be a socialist part of a government where the pro or a radical right as a pullaro in Santa Fe is. Let’s be consistent, we are socialists, we fight against capitalism and we do not ally to the parties of the bourgeoisie, of the ruling class. We are about to build something from below, of the working class to change this social system.”
In that sense, he said that “we must make a leap towards a transformative political force in Argentina of the working class, a party of the working class that can move the foundations of this society and defeat economic power.”
“We need people who are going to oppose the government’s plan and who consequently take the street agenda in Congress, which is a positive novelty that has been in recent times.
The laws we are dealing with imposed on the street. Retirees were imposed on Wednesdays by banking repression and sticks. Disability was imposed by the extraordinary collective disability. The universities, especially last year, imposed their agenda and that is why we will be discussing the veto. The claw. Wow, if the doctors, nurses, cameers who marched again and were accompanying fought, “he explained in relation to the tension between the palace and the street.
On this point it made it clear that the Left Front Unit goes “by deputies and senators who are banked without any lukewarm, with all the radicality that is needed to face this terrible right.”
In his second intervention, Castillo pointed out in some more concrete aspects referred to, for example, to the figure of the presidential veto. He could not slide a personal confession: “One of the main joys I had in my passage through this congress was to cancel those described to Sturzenegger, the most repudiable being of a repudiable government, the one who enjoys the suffering of others, who enjoys the dismissals, who believes that he knows everything and does not know anything. Road, of the work of the CNRT, of the Labores of the INT and the INTA, when we turned those decrees was one of the few things that one said, ‘well, a good one, we hit’ “.
Another point that addressed in this part was the issue of housing. Key if there are. “If something shows the irrationality of capitalism, it is the issue of housing. No housing is built for people who need a home, but for reservation of real estate value or speculation. It is in front, the partner mentioned very well. 300,000 lived in the city, 2 million empty real estate in the country. 4 million families in housing emergency. This system is delirious, it must be changed.”
He explained that “even within the framework of capitalism there are different measures: idle housing tax, full integration of popular neighborhoods, etc.”
Another measure that the PTS is raised in the FITU and that makes to attack the most irrational aspects of this system is the reduction of the working day to 6 hours, distributing the hours available with unemployed.
“If in the 12,000 main companies in the country you do that, you create 1,200,000 jobs with rights”
This can “break the current logic that is the duration of employment with a trend that present in the world that Esteban mentioned, the uberization of employment, employment without rights and denies the dependency relationship.”
He even warned that in many countries it is debated. Uber and all the companies that use it as Delivery, are forcing them to recognize the dependency relationship and to entitle their workers.
“It is not that this is for technology, it is not that there is precarious employment because technology changed. Capital makes this technology to be used to use, but that technology could serve for everyone to work less hours and in better conditions. It is not something damn technology, it is social relationships that make it a damnam.
“That has to be the claim, break with that lie that installed the ruling class that there is informal work because others have labor rights,” he launched.
“Verse, complete lie. They have voted in the Law Bases to take out labor rights and the result was more informality, more work without registering and more precarious work and less work with the right. Then, enough of eating that verse. Since 1929, which the working day was established in Argentina, 1929. And we continue with the same day of 48 hours.”
Finally he left a deep reflection: “When we define ourselves as socialists or communists it is to make society rational. If people do not have housing, I do not build so that no one lives. If we can work two 6 hours, why one 12 hours and another does not work? If we can not destroy the environment, we do not destroy it.”
“Let us plan in such a way that what we produce is in harmony with the resources that the planet we have and we do not finish puree. That some are hypermillionaires and increasingly megamillionaires and others have to stir the garbage to amorphous is something that we do not allow it.”
“The majority of the population is exploited and oppressed in this system. It has to have its own political party and express from there its social interest, the interest of the vast majority since already with the demands of the feminism of the original peoples, taking the measures of criticism of the environmental destruction that this system proposes, but based on a class that can transform society2, it ended.
Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com
