The Court has decided to open oral trial against Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s couple for fiscal fraud of 350,000 euros perpetrated with false invoices. In a car, the magistrate sends Alberto González Amador to the bench in a case in which the State Prosecutor’s Office and Advocacy ask for three years and nine months in jail for him. Together with him, the authors of the supposedly false invoices and the Mexican businessman who also participated in fraud go to trial.
The opening of the oral trial includes not only the accusations of fiscal fraud and documentary falsehood that have conditioned all the investigation, but also those that provide the popular accusations of PSOE and more Madrid: accounting crimes and even of belonging to the criminal organization.
This is the last step of justice to sit to González Amador on the bench in a case that revealed exclusively eldiario.es. The Prosecutor’s Office denounced the businessman for using false invoices so that his companies pay less taxes and thus optimize the millions of euros he won during the pandemic as a sanitary commission. According to the accusations, he used these invoices to endorse fictional expenses to his companies and reduce the Invoice of the Corporation Tax in 2020 and 2021, ceasing to pay 350,000 euros between both years.
The magistrate already decided to process Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s couple waiting for the Provincial Court of Madrid to confirm this decision. The businessman, in turn, is pending a second judicial case. The one that investigates his relationship with the Quirón group and if he bought a society of the wife of a leadership of the sanitary giant as “bribery”, in the words of the Prosecutor’s Office, to continue having commercial treatment with them.
The oral trial opening car includes that Alberto González Amador will sit on a bench in a criminal court. It also exposes jurisprudence to support this step and collects precisely fragments of the Oral Judge Opening order of Judge Angel Hurtado against the Attorney General in the Supreme Court.
Prosecutor and Advocacy ask prison
Alberto González Amador, the four alleged ‘invoices’ and their companies will sit on the bench under the prosecution of the Prosecutor’s Office, the State Advocacy on behalf of the Treasury and the popular accusations of PSOE and more Madrid. Both the Public Ministry and the Advocacy ask for three years and nine months in jail for the employer, distributed among the two fiscal crimes of both years, in addition to an economic conviction: fines that total 624,000 euros in total.
The Prosecutor’s Office and the Advocacy defend the same theory that led the courts in the first quarter of 2024, when González Amador was denounced before the courts of Madrid. That González Amador used the system of false invoices, some of them for non -existent works in Mexico or Ivory Coast, to reduce his fiscal invoice drastically.
The alarms jumped into the finance inspection when they realized that their companies’ income had multiplied and their company tax, however, had been reduced. In the case of PSOE and more Madrid the sentence request amounts to five years in prison by including the crime of criminal organization.
González Amador’s legal strategy, on the other hand, has been variating over the last two years. Before the Treasury, when the process had not yet reached the hands of the courts, it went from denying the irregularities to try to withdraw invoices and, in practice, to recognize that their tax statements were not correct. It was shortly before being denounced when his lawyer, Carlos Neira, addressed the Prosecutor’s Office and the Advocacy in writing to recognize that “certainly” two crimes and prosecutors had been committed and seek compliance that, in practice, avoid the entry into prison of his client and close the case with a conviction but with the least possible noise.
It remains to be seen in the face of this trial, the businessman takes up his negotiations with the Prosecutor’s Office to accept a symbolic prison sentence and seal the case with compliance or if he goes to the trial with the intention of defending his innocence. This process overlaps with the open cause against the Attorney General, precisely, for the filtration of his fiscal fraud confession.
Source: www.eldiario.es
