The ex -consellera Salome Pradas is considered a “head of Turk.” This is stated by its lawyer in an appeal against the car of the Judge of the Dana who quoted her to declare in the case as investigated. The letter, to which Eldiario.es has had access, ensures that the magistrate’s claim is to “be able to attribute the criminal responsibility” of the 228 deaths “for her institutional position” on October 29.
In addition, the defense of the ex -consellera of Carlos Mazón states that “it is not true” that there was a unique command in the emergency response, despite the fact that the special flood plan of the Generalitat Valenciana clearly determines it.
On the contrary, the legal representation of Salome Pradas refers to a “dual management committee” of the meeting of the Integrated Operational Coordination Center (Cecopi), composed of it and the Government delegate, Pilar Bernabé.
The lawyer of the investigated, Eduardo de Urbano, says that in the “normative jungle”, in reference to emergency legislation, in which countless references “to” need for coordination “appear.
The brief ensures that “there were no application protocols of the ES-ALErt system,” although this newspaper published the official protocol of the Ministry of Interior, of the mass alert to mobile phones, which assigns the emergency centers of the autonomous communities to send the message to the population.
The role of technicians: “They are the first to inform”
The Pradas defense directly points to the technicians (although without giving names), of which it says that “they are the first to inform, according to their knowledge and expertise, why what happened and what information they gave to the institutional bodies in charge of the emergency.”
The brief concludes that there is no “criminal reproach” in relation to his performance on October 29 and that the “ideal response in legal terms” must occur in the contentious-administrative jurisdiction.
In short, the defense of the ex -conssellera highlights a fact, in her opinion, “indisputable”: the Dana was a “natural catastrophe of an impressive magnitude that was triggered with an unstoppable speed.” Of course, the writing letter that expresses his argument “from the absolute respect for the victims of the Dana, their relatives and victims.”
Source: www.eldiario.es
