Pump! NYT discloses the existence of a secret plan of the USA for eventual war with China

The New York Times published on Thursday, 20, a report on the existence of an ultra-secret US government document, which would detail military strategies in case of conflict with China. The content, according to the vehicle, includes defense plans and possible Chinese targets.

After the report of the report, President Donald Trump denied the information. In publication on the social network Truth Social, he said: “China will not be mentioned or discussed,” classifying the report as false.

According to the calculation of the The New York Timesthe plan is part of confidential documents prepared by the US Armed Forces for any confrontation scenario between the two countries. The content would address internal protection strategies and offensive operations in response to threats.

The United States and China currently maintain a commercial dispute. The Trump government has imposed rates on Chinese products as part of a policy of encouraging national production. In reaction, the Chinese government has established similar measures on US products.

Despite the environment of economic tensions, there are no official nominations of military movements by both countries.

According to sources consulted by The New York Times, businessman Elon Musk should have access to the content of the UltraSecret plan during a visit to the Pentagon on Friday, 21.

Two authorities informed the newspaper that Musk will receive a reserved report containing information on military strategies and scenario projections involving China.

The report would have between 20 and 30 slides with details on possible Chinese targets and operational responses from the United States in case of climbing threats. Those responsible for the preparation of the plan were not identified, and there is no official confirmation about the full content of the material.

The New York Times publication states that Musk’s access to this type of information represents a significant expansion of its participation in US government affairs. The businessman, according to the newspaper sources, would have become a strategic element in the decision structure of President Trump’s second term.

Currently, Elon Musk leads the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), created as part of an administrative reorganization promoted at the beginning of the current government. The position, with status equivalent to that of secretary, has attributions aimed at reviewing public policies and management of federal contracts and projects.

The report also points out that members of the government and security experts expressed concern about a possible conflict of interest, given the commercial involvement of Musk with Chinese companies and the presence of their business activities in that country.

The situation raises questions about the confidentiality of strategic information and the use of data sensitive by actors with business interests abroad.

O The New York Times He cited sources near the Department of Defense, which did not officially confirm the content of the plan, but recognize the existence of scenario studies for confrontations with various nations, a common practice in military structures.

Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed Elon Musk’s visit to the Pentagon. In a note sent to the newspaper, he said the agency is “excited to receive Musk” on Friday. The official agenda of the visit, however, has not been publicly disclosed so far.

The content of the supposed plan, as reported, was not made available to the public. There is also no confirmation if the material is part of routine strategic planning documents or if it was specifically designed according to the current commercial tensions between the United States and China.

The US government maintains practices to elaborate prospective scenarios for different geopolitical contexts, including war situations, cyber attacks, or threats of weapons of mass destruction. These documents are not usually disclosed, even under transparency regimes.

The possibility of sharing documents reserved with representatives outside the government, such as entrepreneurs, has been the subject of discussions in political and institutional environments.

Opposition parliamentarians have announced that they intend to request clarification on the role of Musk and the criteria adopted for access to confidential information.

So far, there has been no official manifestation from China about the content of the report. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not comment.

The Department of Defense has not confirmed whether the mentioned plan will be formally presented to Elon Musk nor if there will be physical material sharing. The visit to the Pentagon remains scheduled, expecting meetings with members of the National Security Team.

The New York Times report repercussions on international press vehicles and provoked reactions in sectors of the US Congress. Members of the Armed Services Committee of the Chamber of Representatives reported that they intend to follow the case and evaluate if there was a breach of institutional security protocol.