Of the Police Impunity Manual: Aguilar “made the eleven caps shot in the place disappear.” A very serious fact that demonstrates an attempt to hide evidence and manipulate the crime scene. However, instead of condemning this criminal actions, Bullrich went out to defend it. He did it when just a couple of hours were missing for the child to die.

In this way, the minister reached a new level of cynicism by defending the policeman who shot Thiago and blaming the alleged thieves for the shot. According to his aberrant logic, if a policeman kills or hurts an innocent during an operation, the fault is not uniformed, but of the thieves, because they “forced” the agent to shoot. It is the same logic that armies use in wars to justify “collateral damage.”

This statement not only Easy triggerbut reinforces the Chocobar doctrine RECARGED: Under this criterion, any civilian can die in “collateral damage”, and the fault will always be someone, but never of the police. Worse, Bullrich announced that they will try to change the judicial cover against the defendants of theft for “attempted homicide”, when they actually ran away when they heard the shootings. Now that Thiago died, he will surely want to accuse them of homicide.

Legally, it is something irrational. There is no legal support to impute for “homicide” those who did not shoot or assault, but Bullrich does not care: his goal is to shield repressive forces and criminalize the popular sectors. The images of the incident confirm that the officer Facundo Aguilar was not in danger when he shot 11 times in 9 seconds, reaching the little one who was next to his father.
When the police took out his gun, the four young people turned to flee. One had a weapon that did not even work, but at no time there was a confrontation.

Legitimate defense? No. It was an execution. The shots were indiscriminate, in an area with civilians.

Why does Bullrich not talk about the policeman disappearing the bullet caps? Because their priority is to protect the uniformed, not the victims.

Bullrich and his history of repression and institutional violence

This is not the first time that the minister justifies police violence. Under his management, we have witnessed repression of retirees every Wednesday, to journalists -one of them, Pablo Grillohe had even been admitted to serious injuries-and a human rights lawyers, such as Matías Aufieri, Member of Ceprodh, who lost the vision of an eye. They were also affected in the repressions ordered by Bullrich, deputies, such as Alejandro Vilca (Pts-fit), who had to be treated urgently due to eye injuries caused by gases.

And on the other side of the vertex, impunity for security forces, as in the case of Luis Chocobar, who executed a young man from behind and was declared “hero” by Bullrich. We could continue to appoint the closed defense of the gendarmes involved in the disappearance followed by death of Santiago Maldonadoor the prefects who murdered Rafael Nahuel.

Now, Thiago Correa, a 7 -year -old boy, joins the long list of victims of a security policy that prioritizes repression.

Bullrich doctrine: shoot first, ask later

Bullrich not only does not condemn the action of the police, but also demands, sending a dangerous message: “If you doubt, shoot.” This further encourages institutional violence and consolidates a model where the life of the poor is worth nothing. While the officer destroys evidence and the minister defends it, Thiago was admitted to the San Justo Children’s Hospital with brain death. Until today, when about 8 pm he died. His family demands justice. Thiago was a victim of police violence and Chocobar doctrine.

Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com



Leave a Reply