Milei builds a minority in his favor and a majority against. Editorial of “The Red Circle”, a program on the daily left that is broadcast every Saturday from 12 to 14 by radio with you 89.9.

  • At this point it is evident that Javier Milei and the clique that governs does not interest him to expand the social or political bases of his coalition and form a majority that allows him to stabilize his government based on some form of consensus.

  • As an artifact of power follows another logic other than what we knew so far and is similar to those we see in extreme rights that govern in other parts of the world:

  • They consider that the representation of traditional political systems is exploded, it is detonated, there is no more. That of these political systems there are only remains and with a well -consolidated minority it is enough to move towards their economic and political objectives that can synthesize in the establishment of an order that responds 100% to the market laws.
  • They are based on elements that are actually present, in real nuclei because traditional political parties are in crisis and were not recomposed when facing the “Milei phenomenon.” No, the “Milei phenomenon” put them even more in crisis and attempts to dialogue with the time, to try to connect with what they believe is a new spirit of the times, in general, are based on looking for what Milei was right, regardless of margining in many ways aspects in which it is wrong. The implicit reasoning is as follows: an adjustment was necessary, we do not like how Milei does, but it was necessary. In this way, they are already arguing in the field of Milei, not the content, but the form.

  • This led to the most “opponents” to rehearse speeches in which they try to play music that, allegedly, inaugurated Milei and the most collaborativeists, directly led them to guarantee governance, a task that surgically continue to do until today. Example Commission $ Libra.

  • If we add to this that the owners of the country were all this time aligned with Milei because it basically has a project that postulates to give all the power to the owners, we have the “secret” by which it maintains their power and stability.

  • In this there is a kind of self -fulfilling prophecy: as Milei expresses a new common sense of era, I have to adapt to that common sense and when I depart to that common sense, I help Milei.
  • That is why Milei and his ideologues believe that he reaches them with an intense minority (which they feed with “cultural battle” of the right) to advance in the middle of the general confusion, frustration by all the previous failed projects, of the impotence of the political system and the collaboration of much of the union movement.
  • Thus spent a year and a half of libertarian administration. So far it could be said that “everything is going according to the plan.”

  • The owners of the country support it, the opponents help it and the IMF finances the cheap or ironed dollar that keeps inflation controlled and that leads in a first stage to a certain positive assessment against the inflationary defection of Argentina, historically, and especially in the last ten years.

  • Perfect, but what is the only “problem” or the “Achilles heel” of this scheme?: The society in general and especially those that are directly affected by Milei’s economic plan and also those who reject their retrograde and reactionary ideology.

  • The surprising thing, the new in recent weeks or the last month is that more and more broad sectors of all that universe are managing to express themselves beyond the passivity of political and union superstructures. This led to several media or publications to begin to talk about “resistance.” Moreover, He gave uphe dedicated the lid to the question: Where is the resistance to Milei? (In fact, I wrote an article for this June edition).
  • We talk about mobilizations and historical strikes in Tierra del Fuego where thousands of jobs or the Garrahan hospital are in danger in which salary conditions are miserable; We talked about Catamarque teaching that turned a decree that proposed to regulate the entry of teachers as a form of emptying or also of Buenos Aires teachers who stopped (despite the mandatory conciliation) against Kicillof; We talk about people with disabilities and retirees (who managed to impose a vote in Congress); We talk about food workers, metallurgical who fight against dismissals or against the stop to the peers (a dispute that crosses several great unions). Even Gerardo Martínez denounced yesterday at the ILO (he is a representative of the CGT before the international agency) that in Argentina “after the stocks to the dollar, the stocks came to the salary” (formerly Cavallieri). And we also talk about CONICET scientists or the referents of culture fighting the emptying of the National Theater Institute.

  • In this scenario of the social dispute, of the relationship of deeper forces, Milei is played as much or more than in the elections (although this can also have its electoral correlation). Because Milei’s financiers (the IMF) and their royal bosses (businessmen, “investors”) do not essentially look how many deputies or deputies are most sum milei (in fact, this week it was shown that this is not a guarantee of anything because Deputy Santillán speaking of inflation was more a problem than a solution). No, what those who send (those who have a twine or want to put it in Argentina) look are it if the plan is “sustainable.” And sustainable for them is basically socially “sustainable” (and therefore politically).

  • For example, the Labor Reform chapter that wanted to reintroduce Milei through the window in another decree, is symptomatic that has a wide social rejection has been locked again in the Judicial Power.

  • Milei and his group of hallucinated can believe that with a minority of deranged they can lead to society where they are singing, but perhaps, without realizing they are building and sedimenting a majority. A majority against him.

    • POLICY / TAX ADJUSTMENT / JAVIER MILI

    Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com



    Leave a Reply

    Related News

    BRICS parliamentarians criticize US tariff war

    BRICS parliamentarians criticize US tariff war

    June 7, 2025
    Patricia Bullrich defends the policeman who killed Thiago, a 7 -year -old boy

    Patricia Bullrich defends the policeman who killed Thiago, a 7 -year -old boy

    June 7, 2025