Myriam Bregman intervention:
“Obviously, the axis of the discussion is placed in censorship, in the defense of freedom of expression and in which the axis of the central is not changed, which I think is, for all of us, the cut in the area of disability. It seems to me that all the legal swarm that the government is doing is now deliberate. It is deliberate to mix precautionary ones with complaints. Now I will refer to that I will also refer to that. Element of running the axis, that we are all talking about what is coming or what does not come.
So, all the complaints that are making Jorge Rial, Mauro Federico and other co -workers from them, to the streaming they are also denouncing, is because they do not want them to continue telling what happens in that area. And I think there you have to focus the issue, because there you begin to see what the deputies and deputies have to be pronounced that did not come today.
Here we are not asking you to talk about an audio, to make a comment, “What do you think if they were recorded in this or that place?” Here the first thing to differentiate is that a right is being violated that is protected by the National Constitution, by international treaties and by the profuse jurisprudence that Diego just mentioned, and that CELS has achieved international failures for the protection of freedom of expression in Argentina. This has also been discussed a lot.
Yesterday I remembered the famous Ponzetti case of Balbín, where Ricardo Balbín’s widow arrives at the Supreme Court in a ruling of ’84, years after the death of the same, because images of the radical leader had spread in her death bed and the family opposes. There is clearly a private act: it is a funeral. Well, it has nothing to do with what we are discussing. I say it to show that it has nothing to do with the discussions that jurisprudence has given with this case, where it is clearly discussed that a judge extremely conditioned by his curriculum (so to speak elegantly; we could say “prompt”, there is much more appropriate), an extremely conditioned judge, decides to censor something he does not know, who does not know what he affects, because he does not know, he does not hear.
And from that, the Ministry of Security, Patricia Bullrich, set up something that is inexplicable. So inexplicable that she could not explain it herself, that it is to ask for the search of private homes. Why do you have to pave a journalist’s house? What would be the reason? Patricia Bullrich tries, as she has been doing since the day she assumed and in that first demonstration that repressed us on December 20, 2023, 10 days after assumed, install the terrorism figure.
It has reached the ridiculous of paving ice cream makers. But of course, he had accused the person from Vegan, he found chicken, felt and said: “I can’t explain what I found.” Remember, do not forget about the things Patricia Bullrich does to try to install the terrorism figure in our country. And these days, around the actions of journalists making known information, he returned with the idea of terrorism.
That’s why he puts Venezuela, that’s why he puts Russia. That they tell me “the Russian”, I have nothing to do, I want to clarify it now too, right? Because the joke already made me several, so I take advantage and clarify. She is looking for a figure that supports all her actions. And why? Because something that this government did not cut, but increased, is the intelligence apparatus.
Now they are drinking from their own medicine, because they set up parallel intelligence devices, reinforced the SIDE. Patricia Bullrich endowed all legislation and budget to put together the Federal Police and the different agencies that she has security as parallel intelligence devices, perhaps by the government’s inmates. I don’t mind. It is all illegal what they are doing. They violate the intelligence law assembling parallel devices. Now they say that Cabinet Headquarters is also doing it. Well, it would be good if they explain it, because there are already three devices fighting each other. All with state money, all allocating money that cuts social areas to spend it there.
So, a first call that I want to do is that all that legislation approved by Congress makes very little – which Cels also pronounced – of reinforcement of laws, the antimaphia law, reiterate, all those totally unconstitutional things, it is time for Congress to self -call, if the government does not want, and that repeals all that repressive legislation. That repressive legislation cannot be in the hands of Patricia Bullrich or another minute.
That seems important to me. Then, how does Patricia Bullrich act on these issues? We know her. And many, who we have been acting, just remembered it. When we, we denounce with many complainants, mothers of Plaza de Mayo, the CELS as Amicus Curiae, we denounced the gendarmerie project X, a espionage system established by the National Gendarmerie, what did the then deputy Patricia Bullrich do? He asked to quote me to Congress so that I explain where I had taken the information. The same as now: he didn’t care if the Gendarmerie spied, the first thing he said is that I had to come to explain here where he had drawn the information.
So, she has a modus operandi. We know her, no matter how much she locks, babble, say as she said last night. Patricia Bullrich is the usual. When we denounced a journalist who was not a journalist, but did espionage – since he is so interested, right? -, a journalist who was not a journalist but an infiltrator of the Federal Police, Agent Américo Balbuena, Patricia Bullrich did not accompany us. Ten years we had that cause. A year ago we managed to condemn and that in February of this year the Supreme Court ratifies that conviction of the Balbuena agent and his two leaders of the Federal, who sent him to infiltrate posing as a journalist and was not. It was a secret agent of another body of spies that the State has, which is the Federal Police.
So we know this modus operandi, we know how to detect when they go through journalists and are spies. We denounce it and take it to justice, and achieve condemnation. More or less we know where we are located.
Just to finish, one more thing. This case, such as Pablo Grillo, like that of all those who have been suffering repression, move us. To us, from the CEPROD, we are especially moved because our Ceprod lawyer, an advisor to our block in Congress, Matías Offer, lost the vision of an eye for the repression of Patricia Bullrich. He appeared at the Disability Agency to obviously ask for his disability certificate, and Espanyol denied it. He told him no, that he had an eye, that with that he reached him.
So, for us this fight is a fight that we are going to give it until the end, that we are not going to stop until Patricia Bullrich and all their accomplices end up in jail, and all these who played to become living with the money of the disability will know that we will not forget, where we will go to look for them. Because they attacked us, because they attacked Pablo Grillo, because they attacked Matías Offeri, Jonathan Navarro and each of the repressed here in Congress.
That is why it seems to me that, in addition to what I said, it would be very good that next Wednesday, on Wednesday 10, so that we have more time, let’s summon ourselves accompanying the retirees and making a great mobilization against censorship, in favor of freedom of expression, summoning all journalists, calling the photojournalists, summoning all those who are here and are repressed every Wednesday, telling them that freedom of expression, the freedom to Manifestations, the freedom to publicize the news that society wants, we will continue to defend it also in the street.
So I also leave that idea forward: that next Wednesday 10, starting from the mobilization of retirees, we can make a great mobilization. “
And here the video of his complete intervention in the Bicameral Commission:
Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com
