He Candidate for National Deputy of the Left Front spoke with Vorterix Mar del Plata and referred to the growing external indebtedness. He also criticized the hypocrisy of Peronism: “Now they make spots as if they had been in the fight. But they have to put the flag of my party, because they were not. The left was from day one, accompanying retirees and retirees.
“This visit or this meeting that Milei has with Trump is related to the urgency of this government in looking for a New rescue for speculators. A Poquito received a loan from the International Monetary Fund, and last week all alarms were caught with the dollar rise. The Central Bank intervened in the market with USD 1100 million in three days, so that it does not go over the ceiling of the exchange band. Trump would apparently give back, it is not known what I would ask for in return or how much the amount would be. This is More indebtedness, which we are going to pay with our common natural goods, more adjustment to retirees, people with disabilities”.
“We saw this movie. A month before December 2001, Bush gave De la Rúa’s supportbut that was a bottomless barrel. Just as it arrived, he went through the vehicle of the banks that guaranteed the mechanisms for the capital escape of the speculators. That gives you a huge anger because the Constitution says that it should go through Congress, and it was not fulfilled. Then it was done The so -called Guzmán Law. In short, history is repeated: rescues that are diluted in capital escape while mortgaging the country. Congress voted and ratified an agreement to recognize Macri’s debt, which was illegal because it did not go through Congress and totally illegitimate. International Law itself coined the term ‘odious debt’ to describe indebtedness in which those who lend know that the country they receive will not be able to pay. ”
“This debt implies a permanent conditioning to the economythe delivery of natural common goods and a constant looting of the country’s wealth generated by workers. When I listen to Kicillof to say that breaking with the IMF is ‘child’, I think that the child is to believe that you can prosper with this scheme. If we talk about wages that reach, retirees who live well, access to housing, free time, all that is impossible without ignoring the debt and kicking the board. ”
“Ultimately, workers and workers always lose. That’s why Sovereign debt ignorance cannot be an isolated measureit is just an initial kick. One has to nationalize the banking system to take care of small savers and concentrate national savings. With these resources, loans could be given to small ruined merchants, for housing, the small family farmer. At the same time, we must end the control of foreign trade by a handful of cereal and automotive, and put it in the hands of the workers. ”
“With Alberto Fernández he also adjusted to retirees. He who did not receive Bono lost. I do not say it: it is said nine federal courts that indicate that there was a loss of 50% in the recomposition for how the formula was behind. Two million retirees who did not receive a bono lost half of their income. That is the reality of a government that promised not to adjust and ended up doing it as the previous ones. ”
“I think it can be done if we turn everything and think otherwise. From traditional politics they brought us to the ghost train: Caputo, Bullrich, Sturzenegger, the same ones that were with De la Rúa and with Macri, and already made plans of this type. It makes no sense to repeat them. What what We need is mobilization and organization of workers, workers and people to say: of course we have capacity. The first thing is to prohibit dismissals and defend each job.”
Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com
