Hagman reveals that Peronism does not know what to do with debt

Of guarantor of the IMF critic adjustment. Itai hagman, Now with the Patria Force candidate, he presents himself as an expert and ensures that he “already understood” that the debt with the IMF is a problem. He promises that, this time, you have to debate what to do with the background. Although he acknowledges that in Peronism they have no idea what to do with the background, while Axel Kicillof He warns that “it is childish to say that you don’t have to pay the IMF.”

The same as in 2022 gave its place in the Budget Commission to facilitate the approval of the agreement with the IMF that its government signed, today it is presented as a lucid critic of that same agreement and announces that now, seriously, they will build “a consensus” for the next time.

It seems to ignore that everyone’s front already had its chance: mostly in Congress and the Casa Rosada, it repeated the indebtedness and adjustment recipe that today attributes exclusively to Macri and Milei. Of course, now admits – almost as a finding – that “the problem worsened” and that the debt is larger, omitting that his government approved the payment to the IMF of USD 44,000 million, which had given the government of Macri, without serious conditioning, while inflation shot and poverty grew.

It is still more ironic to hear him say that “he cannot happen again” that the elections win without a debt plan, when he himself was part of a coalition that came to power without having any. Promised, as Alberto Fernández did, that would investigate the debt with the IMF and ended up recognizing it without the slightest objection. Now, in “critical” mode against Milei, Hagman discovers the urgency of discussing what to do with the background. Until Martín Guzmán, Architect of that agreement, there seems to be “evolved” in his speech (according to Itai), which only confirms that the failure was so evident that even those responsible prefer to rewrite their past.

And while promising that the next Peronism will make the rich and not the retirees, omits that when they were a government they deepened the same adjustment logic that today says to question. He now argues that society “demands” changes, but before, with them in power, those who paid the consequences were the most vulnerable sectors, beaten by inflation and the deterioration of living conditions.

In short, Hagman It is the perfect example of those politicians who recycle their discourse in campaign and then transform into docile kittens of economic power.