The judge Alejandro Patricio Maraniellowho at the request of the Government prohibited the dissemination of the audios attributed to Karina Mileinot only remained in the center of controversy by a failure considered as a flagrant case of prior censorshipbut also loads with a Printing of complaints of gender violence, sexual harassment, labor harassment and abuse of power. Since the dissemination of the audios of the former director of the Andis, Diego Spagnuolo, exposing the network of coimas and businesses implying “Lule” Menem, Karina Milei, Andis officials, and pharmaceutical suppliers of the State, such as the Argentine Saizo SA, the scandal has not stopped growing.
The decision of the magistrate of Frena the dissemination of audios – without even knowing their content – was interpreted as an attempt to silence journalism and protect the government and the dome of freedom progresses in the middle of a climate of scandals and accusations of corruption. A new impotent maneuver of the government that has not been able to give answers about the leaks, so now tries not to disclose audios, admitting to have lost control of the crisis.
But Maraniello’s figure is not limited to this controversial failure. As stated in the Council of the Magistracy, there are nine complaints against him, of which five correspond to cases of sexual harassment of judicial employees. One of them declared that she was harassed by the judge less than a week after starting working in his court, an example of a pattern that different judicial unions describe as systematic. This and other complaints of the victims reached the Fiscal Unit Specialized in Violence Against Womenwho raised the file remaining in the hands of Judge María Servini and prosecutor Carlos Stonerlli.
In August 2024, the president of the Supreme Court and head of the Magistracy Council, Horacio Rosatti, received a file that detailed accusations against Maraniello for gender violence, abuse, workplace harassment, improper use of public resources, abuse of power, inappropriate behaviors in social networks and breach of the regulation for national justice.
The guild Aefpjn He warned that, as they interviewed workers who went through the Maraniello Court, more testimonies of abuse and harassment arose, both at different times and in different circumstances. The magistrate was notified of the nine charges against him to be defended in the discipline commission of the Magistracy Council.
However, it is of extreme severity that despite the multiple complaints, and ongoing investigation, no extent has been given to exercise its power as a judge until he decides on his suitability – more than questioned – for the position. It is not surprising when it is The judicial caste itself that investigates one of theirs.
Nor is it surprising the rapid measure that came to the government’s request, with an unprecedented urgency, as Myriam Bregman said on social networks: “In this year and a half of Milei we made many judicial complaints, before each repression, when my partner Matías Aufieri took an eye, when they threatened us, when colleagues imprisoned. Justice never acted with the speed of the judge that the government found to censor.
We are all the same before the law but there are some more equal than others, it seems.”
In this year and a half of Milei we made many judicial complaints, before each repression, when my partner Matías Aufieri took an eye, when they threatened us, when colleagues imprisoned. Justice never acted with the speed of the judge who found the …
— Myriam Bregman (@myriambregman) September 1, 2025
So, The judge who tries to shield Karina Milei today in the face of complaints of corruption, appears cornered by an accusations history that exemplifies judicial impunity and violence in court on the magistrates.
Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com
