The Precarious Electoral Unit in the Province of Buenos Aires It cannot cover the internal strong that travels to the wide spectrum of Peronism. The lists closure left grudges, worries and more than one displaced. Far from tempering the spirits, he climbed tensions. He showed, at the same time, the crisis that crosses that movement for a long time, aggravated after the disastrous state experience headed by Alberto Fernández, Cristina Kirchner and Sergio Massa.
The crisis fired sparks in all directions. Trying to separate from this declinein the last hours the Big homeland has been stirring a differentiation That, hints, could become rupture. The threat is concrete: go with separate lists in the national elections of October, in the province of Buenos Aires and in other districts.
First, Ondelia Fernández was in charge of stirring the waters, criticizing Buenos Aires. This Friday Juan Grabois redoubled the betin an interview published in The countrySpanish state newspaper. In dialogue with Martín Sivak, he said, among other things that “with the closure of lists we saw a new degradation (…) they changed the name of the seal – we spend in front of everyone to union for the homeland to end in homeland force – as if the people were dumb and they do not realize that it is the same. We support the Kicillof government and we will defend it, so we are in those lists. By Sergio Massa, which seeks to reposition its political-business group, to place its people with great effects (…) in this national election, both in the province of Buenos Aires and in other parts of the country, we will move forward with our own list.
It is not the first time that records openly denounces Sergio Massa. He did, remember, in the elections of 2023. Throughout that year, he carried out very hard criticism against the then Minister of Economy, which applied an adjustment that, sinking millions in poverty, facilitated the rise of Milei.
Back in April 2023he had said, blunt: “Neither in fart are going to vote for this scoundrel, vendor and cougker.” But disqualifications were very soon. Defeated in the internal of Peronism, recordois gave its explicit support to Massa. An endorsement that publicly claimed, just as he did for the cases of Alberto Fernández and Daniel Scioli. The foundation is always the resigned formula of “minor evil.”
Now, in the face of the October elections, he speaks again in terms of rupture. Although nothing can be ruled out, it is difficult to believe. Not only for the call to vote for Massa in 2023 but also, because I recorded supported everyone’s front until the last day. In fact, his block in deputies contributed, among other issues, to the progress of the deliveryman according to the IMF. Among those contributions was the Hagman’s decision to yield his place in the Budget Commission To be occupied by someone favorable to the agreement. Also to refrain and not vote against when the project reached the enclosure. Others say that in those not so far times, neither recordois nor those who denounced the agreement to the interior of Peronism, took the streets massively, seeking to avoid their approval.
In the report with The countryRecordois also pointed out that “they will converge in Congress” with the rest of the Peronist space. But, then, if there is that eventual programmatic unit, Is all the discussion for a matter of charges?
View things under this prism, everything seems to sound, rather to extreme negotiation. However, the scenario of a break cannot be ruled out. The problem is then What project would incarnate that eventual current. If we review the last story, we find that Alignment to the Management of the Front of All. If we look at the last year and a half, we will see that, even despite the discursive hardness, Great homeland The Global orientation of Peronism.
That orientation was and is still focused on “Wait for the collapse” of Milei so that Peronism can return by electoral route to power. It basically implies discursive hardness while It is limited or prevents the development of resistance in the streets to the adjustment. A “let do” that allows the advance of layoffs, the privatist attack, Anti-Obreras reforms, Cristina Kirchner’s political proscription and the rest of the reactionary agenda, which propose the great business and IMF. Even criticizing other fractions of Peronism, the current headed by Juan recordois did not raise a different agenda.
The political discourse of Patria Grande points in an impotent direction; The supposed “transformation of Peronism from within”. That perspective is behind the thread by legislative charges. But that path implies not questioning any of the essential assumptions of the social and economic program of that political movement.
When Cristina Kirchner was banned, Recordois came to talk about “boycott” to the elections. A few hours later, he set aside that flag and began a thread that still extends. Only the Time will answer the title question. For now, even presenting itself separately in the elections, the Great Homeland Front is not proposing a project that exceeds the limits of a Peronism deeply in crisis.
Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com
