“It is evident that the outgoing Administration in the US intends to continue adding fuel to the fire and continue causing an escalation of tension around this conflict,” he said Dmitri Peskov, Kremlin spokesmanin his daily telephone press conference.
The spokesman stressed that if it is confirmed that the West has given the green light to kyiv that will mean “qualitatively a new phase of tension and a new situation regarding US involvement.“.
Several US media outlets reported on Sunday that the administration Biden decided to allow Ukraine to carry out attacks with US-made weapons on sovereign Russian territorywhich set off all the alarms since it was something that had not been approved until now and about which The Kremlin had reported that if it happened it would consider it as a direct entry of NATO and the United States into the war.
The authorized weapons are, specifically, supersonic guided missiles called ATACMS which can carry conventional or cluster warheads and have a range of about 300 kilometers.
According to US media, President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use long-range missiles limited, for the moment, to defending their offensive positions in the Russian region of Kurskwhere Moscow’s army receives the help of thousands of soldiers from North Korea.
CNN and The New York Times reported this unprecedented decision by the Biden government, which will end its term on January 20, and that It comes as Moscow has deployed nearly 50,000 troops to Kursk, the southern Russian region where kyiv launched its surprise counteroffensive last summer..
Washington had been refusing to provide ATACMS to Ukraine During the first two years of the war, partly due to concerns about its manufacturingas powerful missiles require time and complex components to produce. But there was a more specific reason, Russia’s threat to consider the use of these weapons as a direct attack by the United States..
two months ago, Putin even threatened the use of nuclear weapons if red lines continued to be crossed. regarding military aid and especially the use of American weapons on Russian soil.
this monday Russian officials also promised that Moscow would react to President Biden’s decision, although they did not elaborate on what that response might entail.
Leonid Slutsky, chairman of Russia’s ultranationalist Liberal Democratic Party, said the United States is now directly participating in the conflict. military in Ukraine: “This will inevitably involve the toughest response from Russia, depending on the threats that will be posed to our country.”
The newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazetaclose to the Kremlin, wrote that Ukraine’s ability to attack inside Russia with Western weapons “would create additional challenges for our military,” but added that the decision would not “change the course of the war.”
The influential outlet said that One way Russia could respond would be to provide weapons to Yemen’s Houthi rebels to attack American ships in the Red Sea..
For her part, the Russian legislator Maria Butina said the United States was risking a third world war and expressed hope that President-elect Donald Trump would reverse the decision.
The truth is that the administration Biden makes this announcement two months after leaving the White House and one day after strong attacks by Russia on Ukraine’s electrical infrastructure. He Russian Army is also advancing in the Donbasswithin Ukraine, and saturating the Russian Kursk region with soldiers, including alleged North Korean troops. which had been partially occupied by a Ukrainian outpost.
Trump For his part, he announced thatwould end the war “in 24 hours”, without giving any indication that something like that could be feasiblebut what yes forces the parties to prepare to arrive in better conditions in case they have to sit down to negotiate starting January 20.
Then, The situation in which each one arrives in terms of the territory gained in the Donbass and in Kursk is fundamental. Russia has launched an offensive on those fronts, and beyond. The response of Biden is the risky last-minute slap to avoid ending up leaving office in the middle of a resounding withdrawal after billions of dollars in financial and military aid to Ukraineand leaving the field a little more bogged down towards a possible negotiation based on the relationship of forces on the ground. However, A move like this, in the midst of a world in convulsion and crossed by rising tensions, implies risks that we know how they begin but never how they end..
Source: www.laizquierdadiario.com
